In 2009, after the housing recession was in full swing, I traveled around the Orlando area with a real estate agent who specialized in significantly undervalued properties, typically those that had been foreclosed on and were now bank-owned. Some of the properties were in awful shape, with interior walls punched in by angry former owners as they left their home for the final time, and some outside mechanicals, like air conditioner units, lifted off their foundations and taken away. Unsurprisingly, the selling prices of these properties were way under their inherent value, and with something like $8,000 to $10,000 in rehab costs, the properties could be put back in

One condo could return as much as 20% in rentals, before any management fees.

reasonable shape and rented out at prices that would return about 8% to 12% annually on the cheap investment. In an investment environment in which the only safe return on money was something on the order of a couple of percentage points, such an approach seemed to make a lot of sense –- at least for someone who had connections to a company that could come in and clean up these distressed properties. (In my Orlando real estate guide’s case, it was her son’s company, and the returns were all in the family.)

         For those without an uncle (or son) in the business of rehabbing distressed houses, there are similar opportunities today for the adventurous. Some golf community property owners pressed for cash are still listing their condos and town homes at recession-era prices. Last week I was conducting research for a customer looking to move to a $200,000 golf community condo within eight hours of New York City, and I was perusing listings in the Kingsmill Resort in Williamsburg, VA. I came across one listing for a 2 BR, 2 BA unit posted at $199,500. The fine print indicated it was a foreclosure, but the general description indicated an average annual rental income on the property of $41,000, for an impressive annual return of about 20%. ($40,000 divided by $200,000) Something smelled fishy –- I thought I knew what it was -– and I contacted a Williamsburg Realtor I know and he confirmed my suspicions about management fees the Kingsmill real estate office charges for renting out the condo.

        “They get 50%,” he said. “It’s highway robbery, but they are the only game in town.”

         The own vs. rent conundrum my wife and I confronted early in our marriage (33 years this coming year) is well behind us, what with both a primary home and a vacation home in our real estate portfolio today. But with a daughter about to be a university graduate with stable job prospects, we are into the discussion all over again. She and her boyfriend have been blunt: “We don’t want to waste money on renting.”

         My first instinct is to mutter, “Youth is wasted on the young” and then make the case for patience, establishing a career first, maybe investing excess earnings in the stock market or some other money-grower. And yet, when I think about it, I remember the charge I got when I figured out that buying my first home and paying monthly principal, interest and taxes would save me $100 a month compared with my “wasted” rent at the time. (Note: The home was a brand new cedar and stone contemporary on a beautiful, sloping treed lot north of Atlanta that I bought for $43,000. It was 1978. If I had stayed in that home during the full duration of my 30-year mortgage, it would be worth more than $500,000 today.)