A 'dead cat bounce' is a rather unpleasant term used to describe a small, short-term recovery in a falling stock's price. Why?  Well, if a cat was dropped from the top of a tall building, it would bounce when it hit the ground -- but it wouldn't bounce much, and it would still be dead.  Source - Financial-Guide.net

    President Obama may be overdoing the conciliation thing if that is driving him and his economic team to include $300 billion in tax cuts as a major component of his stimulus plan.  Congress and President Bush were wrong and stupid to send us $1,000 checks last year when the stakes were not nearly as high as they are today.  Those checks stimulated nothing, and a tax break of $300 billion now would be a waste of money at best, and a further step down the ladder toward Depression at worst.
    Here is how tax relief checks will be spent.  Those having trouble
It is unpatriotic not to spend a tax break check, but what are strapped people supposed to do?

making their monthly house payments will use it for that purpose.  Those who have enough in the bank to cover their house costs will shove it into their kids' college education funds.  Those who feel threatened by the real possibility of job loss will take about a minute before they drive it over to their local FDIC-insured bank and deposit it as a security blanket.  The remaining 25 people in America might spend it at Nordstrom...or buy gold bars.
    We Americans had our chance to save, and we blew it through profligate spending, especially on homes many of us could not afford.  Now, however, it is almost unpatriotic to save, assuming you have enough discretionary money for that purpose.  The best way to stimulate the economy, almost all economists agree, is to spend, spend, spend, not save, save, save.
    Okay, if they really insist on giving us the tax break because it will
Give us all a government money card instead of a tax break check.  When we reach our limit on the card, we're done.

make Republicans feel better and the President can keep his promise, then give us all a government money card, good at retailers, food stores, the local donut shop, resorts...virtually anywhere it can be spent to keep people employed, except maybe at gas stations (don't want to encourage more money going to those terrorists).  We pay for stuff with the government charge card, and the bill goes directly to the Feds.  When we reach our limit on the card, we're done.  It will be fun along the way, and it will guarantee to stimulate the economy by a multiple of $300 billion, much better than a multiple of the measly few billion if we leave it up to a strapped citizenry.  We ought to have the technology to do this, and do it fast.
    I did not vote for President Obama because he promised to give all but the wealthy a tax cut.  I voted for him, and donated to his campaign, because I thought he was "that one" who is smart enough and tough enough to do whatever it takes to turn this dead cat economy around, even at the cost of a little political capital.

    After our last child goes off to college in two years, my wife and I will be ready to move south.  Our next home will be smaller than the home in which we raised our kids -- probably 25% smaller, and probably 10% to 20% lower in price than what we will get for our primary home.  Based on comparables in our area of Connecticut, our current house has probably lost 20% or more of its market value in the last two years.  We own golf course property in the south already, and we are pretty well set on where we will live.  
    I talk with people all the time who ask me if I think prices will fall
If prices continue to drop north and south at the same rate, many will lose buying power on their next home.

further in the south.  Well, yes, I do, at least for the next year.  But the key point is that I also think prices in the north will continue to fall as well.
    If prices were to fall north and south at roughly the same rate, then waiting will be a fool's paradise for many baby boomers moving into their retirement years, especially those who plan to downsize their living space.  Simple math argues to sell and move now if you have equity in your home or cash in the bank.  
    Let's say, for example, that your house is worth $600,000, and you have
Prices in the Naples, FL, area have dropped about 45%, and some are getting back into the market.

your eye on a home in the Carolinas whose market value is currently $500,000.  If prices continue to drop in both markets by, say, 10%, your current home will drop $50,000 and your dream home $40,000 in just the next year, costing you $10,000 in buying power.  That may not seem like much, but if your current home depreciates faster than the one you want to buy, then the spread will widen even more.  In a year or two, you might not be able to afford as much house as you can today.  
    A strong case can be made by sheer demographics that the south will rise again faster than the north will, making that spread even wider.  Already there is evidence in places like Naples, FL, that a 45% price drop is about the end of the carnage, and people are starting to actually get back into the market there.  The millions of baby boomers in the north are not going to defer their dreams of a warm retirement for much longer.  
    Everyone's circumstances are different, and if you don't have equity in your current home or enough money in the bank, then the above example does not apply.  But for those fortunate to have resources, and who are waiting for some alchemical miracle of the markets, be careful what you wish for.  A market rebound could negatively affect your dreams.