Just when we thought we would never have David Lereah to kick around anymore, the former chief economist for the National Association of Realtors has decided to reinvent history and try to restore his good name by letting the Wall Street Journal interview him a couple of weeks ago.  Nice try.
    Lereah left the NAR in 2007 -- he says voluntarily -- after pumping sunshine into the housing market
"...we have established a bottom," Lereah said, despite all logic and data.

despite the gathering gloom and all logic, data and the opinions of respected economists to the contrary.  Consider this flight of Lereah fantasy from January 2007, as the market was beginning to cave in on itself: "It appears we have established a bottom."  But by April 2007, home sales had fallen almost 11% from the year earlier and over 2.5% from the prior month.  Lereah left the NAR that month; even they couldn't handle it anymore, which is saying a lot.
    But borrowing a page from the Rod Blagojevich playbook -- or maybe it is the other way around -- Lereah told the WSJ in its January 12 article that he really didn't mean to sound so positive, that his bosses made him do it.  According to the Journal, Lereah says that "because the NAR represented the interests of Realtors, he was pressured to say positive things about the association's data releases, but that he pushed back in some instances" and that "he sometimes asked the public-relations department to tone down the quotes about the housing data releases they had written for him." That sounds somewhat like Blago's line that he angered the state legislature because he tried to do good things for the people of Illinois.  Lereah's old buddies at the NAR have denied the allegations, and according to the "impeached" economist, they are not returning his phone calls or inviting him to their parties. 
    I listened to Lereah on some business shows as the storm clouds were forming in 2006 and 2007,
We'd all be rich if we had shorted real estate every time Lereah said the end of the bottom was near.

spouting his irrational crap about the housing market.  None of his PR handlers were on stage with him.  He could have been more measured in his comments, but he was Pollyanna on steroids. I know little about economics, but Lereah moved me to write in this space in February 2007, "David, just shut up and the market may get better."  I added that, "If there was a way to short the real estate market every time Lereah says ‘the end (of the bottom) is near,' we'd be rich."  Yet the mainstream media kept turning to him for comment, feeding the irrational exuberance that has indirectly hurt so many people.
    Now the media are turning on him, with his cooperation (echoes of Blagojevich there too), reminding us that bloggers had dubbed him Liar-reah and Baghdad Dave for his spate of disinformation.  Under the headline "The Bottom is Near," the Journal on January 11 printed excerpts from Lereah's comments of January 2006 through his "we have reached a bottom" comment exactly a year later.  Lest we think the NAR has learned any lessons from the Lereah legacy, look only so far as the man who replaced him at the NAR.  In Lawrence Yun's latest comments on the market, he says sales of homes might increase by more than 10% with a "proper real estate focused stimulus measure."  Whatever that means.
Note:  If you cannot access the Wall Street Journal articles referenced above, let me know and I will email them to you.
    Ginn again:  The troubled Ginn Resorts announced yesterday that it was giving up sponsorship of the Ginn LPGA Open and the Champions' Tour Ginn Championship, both slated for Florida in April.  Florida is home not only to Ginn corporate offices (Orlando) but also to Ginn's Hammock Beach property, one of the few Ginn resorts that has escaped the flotsam and jetsam of Ginn's default on a $670 million loan from Credit Suisse.  In recent months, Ginn has been forced to shed properties in the Carolinas and Florida, and last year it bowed out of sponsorship of the Ginn Sur Mer tournament on the PGA tour...
    State Farm waves goodbye:  State Farm Insurance Company has
State Farm's request for a 47% hike in premiums was rejected.

announced it is dropping homeowner policies in the state of Florida because it was prevented from charging high enough rates to cover potential losses from hurricanes.  State Farm had argued for a 47% hike last year that was rejected by Florida regulators.  The State Farm decision leaves its 700,000 policyholders in the state to search for alternative coverage; however, in recent years, small insurers have entered the market to fill the gap left by big insurers, albeit at larger annual premiums...
    PURE salvation?  One of those insurers is Privilege Underwriters Reciprocal Exchange, the length of whose name reflects the value of many of the homes it insures.  PURE writes policies for expensive homes in Florida and South Carolina and recently received licenses to do the same in New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Washington, D.C., according to today's Wall Street Journal.  One South Carolina homeowner indicated his 4,000 square foot home near the coast is insured for more than $1 million for an insurance premium of $7,000 annually...
    More bad news for Florida:  Mortgage insurer PMI Group predicted recently that at least one quarter of U.S. housing markets will see lower prices in two years.  According to the PMI survey, Greater Miami, Lake Havasu-Kingman, AZ, and Cape Coral-Ft. Myers, FL run the greatest risk of lower prices than today.  The lowest risk of home price declines are in Pittsburgh, greater Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth...
    Aces Wild:  If you have participated in charity golf tournaments and
The state of Connecticut fined the insurer $5.9 million for peddling hole-in-one insurance without a license.

dreamed of a hole in one that might earn you the brand new car parked adjacent to the green, then consider this cautionary tale.  Kevin Kolenda, a Connecticut businessman, played 12,500 to 1 odds -- the odds of scoring an ace --  and lost $5.9 million.  That is the amount the state of Connecticut charged the unlicensed Kolenda, who had been told by the state in 2001 to stop selling the insurance.  Talk about a toxic combination of bad luck and stupidity:  Golfers at two of the tournaments Kolenda sold insurance to aced the par 3s for a total of $60,000 in prizes.  In commenting on the huge size of the fine, a Hartford Courant editorial said, "State regulators are using a driver when a seven iron would have done the job just fine."  Tell that to the organizations that had to pony up the prizes for the aces.