In a recent issue of the AARP Bulletin, personal finance pundit Jane Bryant Quinn joins the debate about whether retirees should rent or buy a home (although she does not come down on one side of the argument or the other). It appears that those of us 65 and over still prefer to buy, but in ever increasing numbers, those up to a decade younger are deciding to rent.  (Click here for the AARP article.)
        The choice of whether to rent or buy is essentially one of whether you want your money tied up or not. If you have owned your primary home for 15 years or more, chances are the sale will generate a nice pot of cash (assuming no second mortgages need be paid off). That should provide enough to pay in full for a less expensive, smaller golf community home. (The kids are out of the nest, and you no longer need the extra space.) Alternately, you could stash the windfall in any variety of interest-bearing accounts and rent, mindful that the returns on your money may not be very high but that the interest rate is guaranteed, whereas your real estate investment is not.
        Rents go up about 3% every year, according to Ms. Quinn, but so too do taxes and other expenses in an owned home. But for those who choose a stable market in which to buy a house, an increase in the home's value should more than cover the increase in expenses. An average increase of more than 3% in many retiree-friendly markets in the southeast is more than reasonable to expect in the coming years (barring any general economic catastrophe).
Cliffs ValleyIn the wake of the recession, a number of nice homes at the Cliffs Communities Valley community in Travelers Rest, SC, entered the rental market when their owners found it difficult to sell.

        Renting should be the preferred path, at least initially, for those couples that cannot make up their minds where they want to live in retirement but sense one place may be better than others. In that case, rent until you are convinced you will be comfortable with your choice. Also, if you have to invest much of your net worth in a home, and that will put a damper on your lifestyle expenses, you may be a good candidate for renting.
        But if you want control over your living environment, with the freedom to change your living conditions (new kitchen or bath, for example), and you have enough money in reserve to live the way you want to both inside and outside your new golf home, then seriously consider buying.
        In the end, the financial argument for buying versus renting may come down to whether the bought home appreciates more than 3% annually. But the overarching argument is not strictly financial, but rather whether you want the freedom to make changes to your living space and the security that a landlord won't sell out from under you the home in which you have become comfortable. Freedom does have its price.
        Below are a few current comparable houses for sale and rent in golf communities we can recommend. If you would like information specific to your requirements for a golf home, please fill out our Golf Home Survey and we will be pleased to offer you a few initial recommendations.

The Landings, Savannah, GA

For Rent: 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 2,400 sq. ft., $2,100 per month
For Sale: 3 bedroom, 2 bath, 2 ½ baths, 2,600 sq. ft., $299,999*
     • $60,000 down, 30-yr. fixed loan, $1,095 per month

Governors Club, Chapel Hill, NC

For Rent: 4 bedroom, 3 ½ bath, 3,184 sq. ft., $3,200 per month
For Sale: 4 bedroom, 3 ½ bath, 3,280 sq. ft., $495,000

Landfall, Wilmington, NC

For Rent: 4 bedroom, 3 ½ bath, 3,175 sq. ft., $4,000 per month
For Sale: 4 bedroom, 3 ½ bath, 3,104 sq. ft., $739,900

Cliffs Valley, Travelers Rest, SC

For Rent: 5 bedroom, 4 ½ bath, sq. ft. unknown, $3,600 per month
For Sale: Home above, $750,000

        Thumb through any magazine aimed at retirees, including golfers, and you are apt to see a dozen or more ads for golf communities. And for those who have ever asked for information about golf communities from one of the web sites that promotes them, your inbox probably fills up day after day with updates about real estate, the golf course and the latest community event.  Some golf communities have the budgets to bombard their potential customers with messages, but most others –- many of them perfectly fine places to retire -- lie in the weeds (metaphorically speaking).       
Skybrook3fromteeThe tee shot on the par 3 3rd at Skybrook provides a preview of the bunkering and elevation changes across the entire 18 holes.       
        I stumbled across one of these recently in Huntersville, NC, in a location that should be attractive to retirees looking for proximity to a major city without feeling they live in a densely populated area. The community of Skybrook is not huge, at 1,100 acres and 1,300 homes when fully built out; it is just about a half hour from Charlotte, NC, one of the major cities of the exploding southeastern U.S., and about the same distance to Lake Norman, also located north of the city. I stopped at Skybrook on my way to Greenville, SC, because of the community's John LaFoy designed golf course, which I hoped would be as much fun to play as two of the architect's layouts I had played previously -- Glenmore, just west of Charlottesville, VA, and The Neuse, in Clayton, NC. I wasn't disappointed (more below).       
        The most impressive aspects of Skybrook are the price points on the mostly large and well-designed homes, many of those for sale listed at around $100 per square foot, land included, and some below that level. Every once in a while in a golf community you may run into the odd house –- and sometimes they are "odd" in terms of their details –- priced below $100 per square foot, but you don't typically have a decent selection of those inside the boundaries of a well-landscaped, well-organized golf community. At Skybrook, you do.
        "Skybrook is only 14 years old," says local Realtor Kevin Martin, "and it grew fast."