by Rick Vogel
        To buy or not to buy, that is the question.  Landslide mapping, soil surveys, landslide histories and common sense dictate that dangers lurk on the steep slopes of western North Carolina's most popular properties.  Some developers, realtors and their political enablers argue there have
Gone are the five geologists responsible for landslide hazard mapping in western North Carolina.

been few deaths and minimal property destruction caused by landslides. They also argue that landslide hazard mapping to determine safety is not cost effective.  Now the North Carolina Republican-controlled legislature, to prove the points, has pulled $355,000 of funding that was being used to employ five state geologists in the mapping of dangerous areas throughout all 19 western North Carolina counties.
        This move begs the question:  Was it truly budget concerns and cost savings that prompted these lawmakers to target landslide hazard mapping?  As Asheville-based Southern Environmental Law Center attorney D.J. Gerken points out, "Certainly some of the legislators have been very open in their statements that they viewed these maps as a backdoor to regulation and were not the least bit sorry to see these maps go away."
        What is missing from the debate -– the prospective buyer -- is more important than the motives of elected officials who have effectively moved to hide this information from the public.  What prospective buyer of steep slope property would be comfortable in making an informed decision about safe building
The $355,000 saved from the program's elimination is less than the value of many homes in landslide prone areas.

and/or possible financial loss absent information about potential landslides?  Those with the most to lose have been essentially without voice in the process.  Is it reasonable to believe that someone willing to spend $300,000 to a $1,000,000 or more for a new home would choose to ignore the benefits of landslide hazard maps that might well result in safer construction?  If this information could be had by the inclusion of a few hundred thousand dollars in the state budget, are we to believe that state legislators are working in the best interests of their constituents when they suggest these very same constituents should be kept unaware of the many dangers that could be avoided by landslide mapping?
        The truth of the matter is much simpler than any interest in the public's needs.  The fact is that landslide mapping would result in some property being deemed not safe to sell or develop.  It is unimaginable that this information would not be of interest to a prospective buyer.  Outrageous is the only word that can be used to describe the self-serving choices of some developers, realtors and numerous political hacks working in concert to keep this information as far away from interested buyers as possible.  Why would they do this?  Greed, plain and simple, the very same mindset that is responsible for the current economic downhill slide.
        There is no insurance available to cover any loss caused by earth movement, manmade or otherwise.  The only protection you can buy that might tell you if construction is safe and your investment is likely secure is the initial site-specific survey prompted by landslide mapping information.  This one time cost is arguably the most important money that you could spend related to a mountain home, and yet some NC elected officials have voted otherwise.  The argument against continuing state landslide mapping is simply dumb and potentially dangerous for the eventual occupants of the property.

Rick Vogel, who has contributed articles to Golf Community Reviews in the past, and his wife Lynne reside in the golf community of Wolf Laurel near Asheville, NC, and are among our web site’s most dedicated readers.  Although Rick’s opinions in his editorial are his own, count your editor as four-square in support of more information for prospective buyers, especially where safety is concerned.  I invite other readers to contribute their own opinions on this and other subjects related to real estate, golf and, especially, the combination of the two.

by Tim Gavrich

 

        Opened in 2005, the golf course at Bayside Resort in Selbyville, DE, is the newest of the three main public options around Rehoboth Beach.  It was designed by all-time great player Jack Nicklaus and is a test that would stretch the abilities of the Golden Bear himself, even in his prime.  At 7,545 yards from the back tees, with a rating of 77.4 and a slope of 146, it is one of the toughest golf courses anywhere and certainly not a place where a beginner will enjoy learning the game (although billed as a “resort” course, it is possible to be stuck behind a player whose time – and yours – might be better spent on a less rigorous routing.  However, a shrewd under-20-handicap player will be able to navigate the course after choosing the proper set of tees, in spite of Bayside’s many hazards.

        As one of his more recent efforts, Bayside is indicative of Nicklaus’ maturation as a golf architect.  He has been active since the 1970s, and his earlier designs were often heavily sculpted and manufactured, bursting with chocolate-drop mounds, small greens, and nightmarish bunkers.  Though some of his earlier efforts, such as Loxahatchee in Jupiter, FL, and Grand Cypress outside of Orlando are still well-regarded by golf architecture buffs, his more recent efforts, such as May River outside of Hilton Head, SC, and, indeed, Bayside display a greater grasp of subtlety and a nod to the game played by higher-handicap players.

Bayside2approach

The approach to the par 5 2nd hole at the Nicklaus-designed Bayside.

Photos by L. J. Gavrich

 

        Bayside weaves in and out of forest and expansive wetlands that border nearby Assawoman Bay.  The golf course features quite a few forced carries, but if a player chooses the correct set of tees, lost golf ball totals should be kept fairly low.  At the par five 2nd hole, for example, the longest tees encourage the low-handicap golfer to play diagonally across a corner of a pond, but the shorter tees offer a more straight-on angle up the broad fairway, with room to avoid the pond to the right.

        Nicklaus tends to build exemplary par threes, and Bayside is no exception in that regard.  The 227-yard third hole (172 from the middle set) demands a long iron or fairway wood to a small green surrounded by large short-grass chipping areas and a tiny bunker off to the left.  Even if the player misses the green — not unlikely — there are myriad ways to play the next shot.  Allowing the golfer to agonize over whether to putt, pitch, bump and run or flop a ball near the hole is part of what makes for successful, entertaining green complexes that stick in the player’s head long after the round is over.

BaysideCondos

Bayside's real estate runs the gamut from single-family homes to multi-floored condos that dominate a few of the vistas from the golf course.

 

        Another lovely short hole at Bayside is the beguiling 13th, the shortest on the golf course at 174 yards from the back tees (142 from the middle tees).  Its slender, two-level green is angled from front-right to back left and sits confidently in an idyllic setting amidst marsh and pines.  A rear pin position encourages a running shot that lands in the middle of the green and drifts down a slope towards the hole.  Errant shots will likely find one of three bunkers from which an up-and-down could provide a big lift to the round.

        In addition to its tough, well-maintained, enjoyable golf course, Bayside Resort delivers a large grass driving range, as well as a modest but, nonetheless, functional putting green.  The day we played, LPGA Futures Tour player Ayaka Kaneko was practicing her putting at Bayside, further legitimizing the quality of the conditioning and practice facility.

        Bayside’s peak-season green fees top out at $119, which is in line with the quality of the golf course and facilities.  We played in the afternoon and the $84 we paid made Bayside a better value and overall experience than nearby Baywood Greens.

Bayside15par3

The marsh is ever-present at Bayside, as it is at the par 3 15th.

*

        Editor’s Note: Our one and only previous visit to Bayside was two winters ago, a couple of days after a record-breaking snowstorm.  Roads were nearly impassable and the golf director did not show up for a scheduled meeting.  I understood.  In the heat of summer, the views from the golf course are all over the place, literally and figuratively.  The marsh is as attractive as parts of the Carolinas low country, and the spectre of the large hotels along the beach at Ocean City, MD, about four miles in the distance is strangely attractive, especially when lit from the west in the afternoon.  That said, the developers of Bayside made an unappealing choice in mixing attractive single-family homes on small lots between multi-story condo buildings that some might label “stack-a-shacks”; unfortunately, those hulks dominate some of the views from an otherwise impressively laid out and challenging golf course.

BaysideOceanCitySkyline

The monolithic hotels of Ocean City, MD, are just a few miles from Bayside.