I am constantly amazed at the amenities some golf communities offer, in addition to excellent golf.  It is a veritable groaning buffet, with an assortment of activities and services few short of Superman could have the time or energy to indulge in.  But in hyping sales of land, developers find the all-things-to-all-people style of marketing effective.  
    For those who buy into an amenity-loaded community early in its

If Sally and Ted next door are horse people, and you are golfers, the negotiations could become confrontational.

development, there are two areas of concern.  First is whether the promised amenities will actually be built.  Many developers fund their clubhouses and pools and fitness centers with land sales.  In a market like the current one, promises sometimes are not kept because the sales do not come as planned.  Second, developers eventually sell out most or all of the land in a community and move on to another project.  When they do, they typically sell the amenities to the homeowners or, in other cases, to outside managers.  
    Either way, there is the risk of sticker shock when, overnight, the fitness centers, pools, tennis courts, spa, equestrian center and maybe even the golf course are no longer subsidized by the developer.  You and your neighbors now own them, and if you are golfers and Sally and Ted next door are horse people, negotiations about maintenance and service could become confrontational.  The safest amenities play is to buy into a community whose residents already own the amenities and have a track record of fiscal responsibility and only modest, if any, dues increases and assessments.  
    If you do buy into a newer community with a developer still on site, ask for a copy of the developer's plan, which could very well indicate at what price he intends to sell the amenities to the homeowners.  Better yet, get yourself an aggressive real estate agent to represent you.  Best of all, ask me.  I know such an agent who has traveled extensively to communities in the southern U.S., has great contacts in the region, and is relentless when it comes to reading the fine print in documents and holding developers' feet to the fire for her clients. 

    You won't pay a thing for her services and she will negotiate the best price in your behalf.  Recent negotiations in behalf of her clients saved them tens of thousands of dollars.
    Click here, send me a note, and I will put you in touch with her.

    When the Cliffs Communities announced that Tiger Woods' first U.S. design, at the Cliffs High Carolina, would be a walking course only, I was mystified and a little insulted.  Let's face it, casual golfers aren't known for being fitness freaks.  I wondered if The Cliffs had decided to make the High
A walking-only course in the mountains was a nutty idea.

Carolina course an extension of their vaunted wellness centers.  A walking course in the mountains seemed like the ultimate niche play.  And what were they willing to pay to attract and keep good caddies?  It was a nutty idea, but allegedly Tiger was intrigued by it, saying early on that he looked forward to playing his first U.S. design with his friends (all of them, no doubt, as physically fit as he).
    I was insulted by the announcement because, even if I could afford to buy a home in a Cliffs golf community and pay the $150,000 initiation fee, I would not be able to play Tiger's course.  My days of 4 ½ mile walks are over, as I suspect they are for many who otherwise can afford the Cliffs' high price tags.
    Well, the issue appears moot now.  Local scuttlebutt is that the Cliffs and Tiger have abandoned the "walking only" policy.  Cliffs advertisements now refer to the course as "walkable," a far cry from the initial announcement of no motorized carts.  Perhaps Tiger's knee problems and the realization that, at least for a while, he could not walk his own course, brought him and The Cliffs down to earth.
*

    Speaking of not down to earth, marketing copy for The Cliffs and most other high-end communities is typically as lofty as the surrounding mountains, but the words they attribute to Tiger, and his apparent sign-off, is unbecoming of an alumnus of Stanford, one of the best universities in the nation.  We'll give Tiger a pass on the word "walkable," which my grammar checker doesn't like but which has probably reached the status of common use.  But twice at The Cliffs web site, Tiger's comments about his course employ the use of the term "very unique," as if there are degrees of uniqueness. (Tiger himself is unique, not very unique or somewhat unique or kinda unique.)  Ugh.

    The Cliffs, which in a bad year spends many millions of dollars on advertising and marketing, could stand to invest in a proofreader.