Just because a person is a billionaire doesn't make them smart when it comes to buying a home in a golf community.  Their mistakes are just magnified, and sometimes covered in the newspaper.
    A Boston private equity firm purchased the ill-fated Yellowstone Club in Montana yesterday for $115 million, more than five times less than its estimated value just a few years ago.  Left with devalued properties after years of wrangling with the profligate owners, Tim and Edra Blixseth, are
Four years ago, Executive Golfer ran a fawning article on Tim Blixseth, founder of Yellowstone.  Blixseth and his wife, now divorced, have been accused of spending their customers' money on their personal luxuries.

billionaire Bill Gates, senior execs from News Corp. and Comcast, and Credit Suisse, which should be renamed Credit Riske for its penchant for bad loans to such troubled properties as Promontory (Utah) and some of the Ginn Resort holdings.  The Blixseths, once ranked among the nation's richest couples, are accused of spending their customers' money to finance their ultra-expensive lifestyle.  In one of life's enduring lessons, the life of luxury was not enough to keep the duo from each other's throats in a messy divorce that left Edra Blixseth owning Yellowstone after the proceedings but surfaced the deeper financial issues at the Club.  Mrs. Blixseth recently filed for personal bankruptcy.
    As a public service for Mr. Gates and his fellow billionaires, and for the rest of us considering a golf community property, here are some lessons learned from Yellowstone:
  • Research the developer's experience. In the case of Yellowstone, it was Tim Blixseth's first community, and it was a whopper. Like the game of golf or writing computer programs, it takes practice to get it right.
  • Don't fall for the hype. Developers with lots of money can pay for PR that makes them seem better than they are. Consider this ironic piece of fawning pabulum from Edward Pazdur, publisher of Executive Golfer, at the end of an interview about Yellowstone that he conducted with Tim Blixseth four years ago: "It seems to me, Mr. Blixseth, that your early days of gambling paid off big. And the best is yet to come."
  • Beware of highly leveraged properties. When Yellowstone sold yesterday for $115 million, it had an outstanding debt of $375 million to Credit Suisse. Come to think of it, if Credit Suisse is bankrolling the property you are interested in, reconsider. They have bet, and lost big, on such troubled assets as Ginn Resort properties and the deluxe Promontory Club in Utah, recently sold in bankruptcy.
  • Super-rich people are not as smart as the rest of us when it comes to buying stuff...because they don't have to be. Just because rich friends have bought into a deal (keyword search "Madoff") doesn't mean it is a good deal.
  • Finally, and this goes for any investment, if it sounds too good to be true, it is. Or, in the words of Bob Dylan, "Don't go mistakin' paradise for that home across the road."

    In good economies and bad, the decision to buy a vacation home is rarely a case of mathematics but rather of convenience and emotion.  If the decision was only about a few weeks stay per year, $300,000 for a nice condo or patio home would pay for 30 nice annual vacations any place in the world you desire.  You would not be stuck having to spend your summer weeks in the same place (unless you spent your money on a timeshare, which is a story for another day).
    Strictly speaking as a financial venture, owning a vacation home makes no sense.  But the decision to
The point at which renting a vacation home makes more financial sense than owning seems to be less than six months a year.

purchase a vacation home is more complicated than just dollars and sense.  It involves the heart as much as the head and can turn on whether your goals are to leave something to the kids, take advantage of a beaten down market, have a warm weather place you can flee to, even at the last minute, during a cold spell or even impress your neighbors back home with one symbol of your success (for some, that's a motivator).
    Renting year-to-year is of course a viable alternative and provides a measure of flexibility.  If you don't like the neighbors, the traffic or the increase in flood insurance, for example, you can simply book a different vacation spot the following year.  But somewhere between renting and buying is a demarcation point where it makes one option a better financial play than the other.  According to one analysis, at the web site InvestmentNews.com, that point is at six months; that is, if you rent for less than half the year, you will probably make out better than it you buy.  If you rent for more than half a year, owning a home (based on a few conservative assumptions) is probably a better deal.  The calculations were made using the example of a $300,000 home and rentals of comparable homes for $3,000 per month (although that rental figure seems unrealistically high).  
    One of many "real life" examples is a condo in Pawleys Island, SC, adjacent to the well-regarded True Blue Plantation golf course -- a three-bedroom, two-bath unit currently on the market for $239,900.  Nearly identical condos in the same complex are available for rent beginning at around $1,000 per month.  In that ratio or rent to list price, renting seems like a pretty good deal. 
    In the end, each individual or couple will put some additional value on the intangibles of home ownership versus renting.  And although the advice here is always to rent for a few months, if possible, in a community in which you are seriously considering a purchase, you will almost always make out better financially by owning a year round home than by renting it for 12 months at a time.
    You can read the InvestmentNews.com article by clicking here.